The article explores whether biological agency—the idea that organisms act toward their own goals rather than merely following genetic instructions or environmental stimuli—is a scientifically productive concept. It examines the tension between mechanistic, gene-centered views of life and theories that treat living entities as causal agents capable of making decisions based on immediate contextual information.
* The debate over whether agency is a fundamental biological attribute or just phenotypic plasticity
* Theoretical attempts to "naturalize" agency through empirical measurement
* How the concept relates to evolutionary theory, multicellularity, and artificial intelligence
A survey of 100 researchers in animal behavior, conducted by Marcela Benítez and colleagues from Emory University and published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, has provided insights into current scientific views on animal emotions and consciousness. The survey reflects a growing acceptance of these capacities in a wide range of animals, highlighting the evolving perspectives in the field of animal behavior.
| Animal Group | Percentage Believing in Emotions |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------|
| Non-human primates | 98% |
| Other mammals | 89% |
| Birds | 78% |
| Cephalopods | 72% |
| Fish | 53% |
| Insects | 67% |
| Other invertebrates | 71% |
The survey suggests a significant shift in scientific thought, with a majority of researchers now attributing emotions to a wide range of animals, even those previously considered less sentient. This indicates a growing acceptance of the complexity and depth of animal emotional experiences, likely influenced by recent research in animal cognition and emotions.