Code Wiki is a platform that maintains a continuously updated, structured wiki for code repositories, aiming to improve developer productivity by unlocking knowledge buried in source code. It features automated documentation, intelligent context-aware chat, and integrated actionable links.
OpenAI releases GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-5.1 Thinking, upgrades to the GPT-5 series focusing on improved intelligence, conversational style, and customization options for ChatGPT. Includes new tone presets and the ability to fine-tune characteristics.
LLMs are powerful for understanding user input and generating human‑like text, but they are not reliable arbiters of logic. A production‑grade system should:
- Isolate the LLM to language tasks only.
- Put all business rules and tool orchestration in deterministic code.
- Validate every step with automated tests and logging.
- Prefer local models for sensitive domains like healthcare.
| **Issue** | **What users observed** | **Common solutions** |
|-----------|------------------------|----------------------|
| **Hallucinations & false assumptions** | LLMs often answer without calling the required tool, e.g., claiming a doctor is unavailable when the calendar shows otherwise. | Move decision‑making out of the model. Let the code decide and use the LLM only for phrasing or clarification. |
| **Inconsistent tool usage** | Models agree to user requests, then later report the opposite (e.g., confirming an appointment but actually scheduling none). | Enforce deterministic tool calls first, then let the LLM format the result. Use “always‑call‑tool‑first” guards in the prompt. |
| **Privacy concerns** | Sending patient data to cloud APIs is risky. | Prefer self‑hosted/local models (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) or keep all data on‑premises. |
| **Prompt brittleness** | Adding more rules can make prompts unstable; models still improvise. | Keep prompts short, give concrete examples, and test with a structured evaluation pipeline. |
| **Evaluation & monitoring** | Without systematic “evals,” failures go unnoticed. | Build automated test suites (e.g., with LangChain, LangGraph, or custom eval scripts) that verify correct tool calls and output formats. |
| **Workflow design** | Treat the LLM as a *translator* rather than a *decision engine*. | • Extract intent → produce a JSON/action spec → execute deterministic code → have the LLM produce a user‑friendly response. <br>• Cache common replies to avoid unnecessary model calls. |
| **Alternative UI** | Many suggest a simple button‑driven interface for scheduling. | Use the LLM only for natural‑language front‑end; the back‑end remains a conventional, rule‑based system. |
- Isolate the LLM to language tasks only.
- Put all business rules and tool orchestration in deterministic code.
- Validate every step with automated tests and logging.
- Prefer local models for sensitive domains like healthcare.
| **Issue** | **What users observed** | **Common solutions** |
|-----------|------------------------|----------------------|
| **Hallucinations & false assumptions** | LLMs often answer without calling the required tool, e.g., claiming a doctor is unavailable when the calendar shows otherwise. | Move decision‑making out of the model. Let the code decide and use the LLM only for phrasing or clarification. |
| **Inconsistent tool usage** | Models agree to user requests, then later report the opposite (e.g., confirming an appointment but actually scheduling none). | Enforce deterministic tool calls first, then let the LLM format the result. Use “always‑call‑tool‑first” guards in the prompt. |
| **Privacy concerns** | Sending patient data to cloud APIs is risky. | Prefer self‑hosted/local models (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) or keep all data on‑premises. |
| **Prompt brittleness** | Adding more rules can make prompts unstable; models still improvise. | Keep prompts short, give concrete examples, and test with a structured evaluation pipeline. |
| **Evaluation & monitoring** | Without systematic “evals,” failures go unnoticed. | Build automated test suites (e.g., with LangChain, LangGraph, or custom eval scripts) that verify correct tool calls and output formats. |
| **Workflow design** | Treat the LLM as a *translator* rather than a *decision engine*. | • Extract intent → produce a JSON/action spec → execute deterministic code → have the LLM produce a user‑friendly response. <br>• Cache common replies to avoid unnecessary model calls. |
| **Alternative UI** | Many suggest a simple button‑driven interface for scheduling. | Use the LLM only for natural‑language front‑end; the back‑end remains a conventional, rule‑based system. |
"Talk to your data. Instantly analyze, visualize, and transform."
Analyzia is a data analysis tool that allows users to talk to their data, analyze, visualize, and transform CSV files using AI-powered insights without coding. It features natural language queries, Google Gemini integration, professional visualizations, and interactive dashboards, with a conversational interface that remembers previous questions. The tool requires Python 3.11+, a Google API key, and uses Streamlit, LangChain, and various data visualization libraries
Analyzia is a data analysis tool that allows users to talk to their data, analyze, visualize, and transform CSV files using AI-powered insights without coding. It features natural language queries, Google Gemini integration, professional visualizations, and interactive dashboards, with a conversational interface that remembers previous questions. The tool requires Python 3.11+, a Google API key, and uses Streamlit, LangChain, and various data visualization libraries
A Python-based log analyzer that uses local LLM (Llama 3.2 to explain the errors in simple language and summarise them (again, in simple language)
A command-line tool that lets you interact with your terminal in natural language. All inference stays local.
By mid-2025 China had become a global leader in open-source large language models (LLMs). According to Chinese state media, by July 2025 China accounted for 1,509 of the world’s ~3,755 publicly released LLMs, far more than any other country. This explosion reflects heavy state and industry investment in domestic AI, open licensing (often Apache- or MIT-style), and a strategic pivot by Chinese tech giants and startups toward publicly shared models. The result is a "revival" of open-source AI, with dozens of Chinese LLMs now available for download or use via Hugging Face, GitHub, or cloud APIs. These range from general-purpose foundation models dozens of billions of parameters in size to specialized chatbots and domain experts, many built on Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures.
Open-source Python library any-llm allows developers to switch among cloud and local model providers without rewriting code.
This post explores how to solve challenges in vector search using NVIDIA cuVS with the Meta Faiss library. It covers the benefits of integration, performance improvements, benchmarks, and code examples.
This article details how the author successfully ran OpenAI's Codex CLI against a gpt-oss:120b model hosted on an NVIDIA DGX Spark, accessed through a Tailscale network. It covers the setup of Tailscale, Ollama configuration, and the process of running the Codex CLI with the remote model, including building a Space Invaders game.
