A distillation of the Claude Fable 5 workflow into actionable skills designed to guide AI agents through a systematic think, act, and prove methodology. The framework improves agentic reliability by enforcing specific sequences like classifying tasks, gathering parallel evidence from primary sources, making surgical edits rather than broad changes, and undergoing adversarial verification via an automated judge. It includes specialized domain adapters for sectors such as coding, research, marketing, and DevOps to tailor the reasoning process to specific professional requirements. The method is specifically designed to mitigate common LLM failures like reward hacking, silent code errors in tests, and false claims of task completion.
>"Before Fable 5 was deprecated, it wrote down its own problem-solving method. Step by step. How it classifies a task, defines "done," gathers evidence, commits to one recommendation, makes the smallest correct change, verifies by observation, and reports the outcome honestly."
- Core skills: fable-method (thinking), fable-loop (orchestration), fable-judge (verification), and fable-domain (adapter generation)
- Focuses on preventing unauthorized staging or "reward hacking" through strict observation cycles
- Validated against 260+ agent runs using blind LLM judges to verify results via code execution rather than reports
>"Before Fable 5 was deprecated, it wrote down its own problem-solving method. Step by step. How it classifies a task, defines "done," gathers evidence, commits to one recommendation, makes the smallest correct change, verifies by observation, and reports the outcome honestly."
- Core skills: fable-method (thinking), fable-loop (orchestration), fable-judge (verification), and fable-domain (adapter generation)
- Focuses on preventing unauthorized staging or "reward hacking" through strict observation cycles
- Validated against 260+ agent runs using blind LLM judges to verify results via code execution rather than reports
A single CLAUDE.md file to improve Claude Code behavior, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
This article discusses how to effectively utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) by acknowledging their superior processing capabilities and adapting prompting techniques. It emphasizes the importance of brevity, directness, and providing relevant context (through RAG and MCP servers) to maximize LLM performance. The article also highlights the need to treat LLM responses as drafts and use Socratic prompting for refinement, while acknowledging their potential for "hallucinations." It suggests formatting output expectations (JSON, Markdown) and utilizing role-playing to guide the LLM towards desired results. Ultimately, the author argues that LLMs, while not inherently "smarter" in a human sense, possess vast knowledge and can be incredibly powerful tools when approached strategically.
This document provides guidelines for maintaining high-quality Python code, specifically for AI coding agents. It covers principles, tools, style, documentation, testing, and security best practices.
An analysis of the current LLM landscape in 2026, focusing on the shift from 'vibe coding' to more efficient and controlled workflows for software development and data analysis. The author advocates for tools like AI Studio and OpenCode, and discusses the strengths of models like Gemini 2.5 Pro and Claude Sonnet.
The article details the author's use of Claude Code to add a feature to a GitHub repository: an automatically updated README index. It's accompanied by a 7-minute video demonstrating the process.
