0 bookmark(s) - Sort by: Date ↓ / Title / - Bookmarks from other users for this tag
Guidance on choosing the best AI model for GitHub Copilot projects, considering speed, depth, cost, and task complexity. Models discussed include GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, o4-mini, o3, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and GPT-4.5.
This article explores a framework for evaluating AI models for use with GitHub Copilot, considering factors like recentness, speed, accuracy, and how to test them within your workflow. It highlights the benefits of using different models for chat versus code completion, and reasoning models for complex tasks.
Adaptive Computer is launching a no-code web-app platform, ac1, designed to allow non-programmers to build full-featured applications using simple text prompts. They recently raised a $7 million seed round. The platform handles backend infrastructure, offering features like databases, user authentication, and AI integrations.
A Reddit thread discussing preferred local Large Language Model (LLM) setups for tasks like summarizing text, coding, and general use. Users share their model choices (Gemma, Qwen, Phi, etc.) and frameworks (llama.cpp, Ollama, EXUI) along with potential issues and configurations.
Model | Use Cases | Size (Parameters) | Approx. VRAM (Q4 Quantization) | Approx. RAM (Q4) | Notes/Requirements |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 3 (Meta) | Summarization, conversational tasks, image recognition, translation, simple writing | 3B, 4B, 7B, 8B, 12B, 27B+ | 2-4GB (3B), 4-6GB (7B), 8-12GB (12B) | 4-8GB (3B), 8-12GB (7B), 16-24GB (12B) | Excellent performance for its size. Recent versions have had memory leak issues (see Reddit post – use Ollama 0.6.6 or later, but even that may not be fully fixed). QAT versions are highly recommended. |
Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba) | Summarization, coding, reasoning, decision-making, technical material processing | 3.5B, 7B, 72B | 2-3GB (3.5B), 4-6GB (7B), 26-30GB (72B) | 4-6GB (3.5B), 8-12GB (7B), 50-60GB (72B) | Qwen models are known for strong performance. Coder versions specifically tuned for code generation. |
Qwen3 (Alibaba - upcoming) | General purpose, likely similar to Qwen 2.5 with improvements | 70B | Estimated 25-30GB (Q4) | 50-60GB | Expected to be a strong competitor. |
Llama 3 (Meta) | General purpose, conversation, writing, coding, reasoning | 8B, 13B, 70B+ | 4-6GB (8B), 7-9GB (13B), 25-30GB (70B) | 8-12GB (8B), 14-18GB (13B), 50-60GB (70B) | Current state-of-the-art open-source model. Excellent balance of performance and size. |
YiXin (01.AI) | Reasoning, brainstorming | 72B | ~26-30GB (Q4) | ~50-60GB | A powerful model focused on reasoning and understanding. Similar VRAM requirements to Qwen 72B. |
Phi-4 (Microsoft) | General purpose, writing, coding | 14B | ~7-9GB (Q4) | 14-18GB | Smaller model, good for resource-constrained environments, but may not match larger models in complexity. |
Ling-Lite | RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), fast processing, text extraction | Variable | Varies with size | Varies with size | MoE (Mixture of Experts) model known for speed. Good for RAG applications where quick responses are important. |
Key Considerations:
Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal, allowing chat-driven development with the power to execute code and manipulate files.
Details the development and release of DeepCoder-14B-Preview, a 14B parameter code reasoning model achieving performance comparable to o3-mini through reinforcement learning, along with the dataset, code, and system optimizations used in its creation.
"OpenHands LM is built on the foundation of Qwen Coder 2.5 Instruct 32B, leveraging its powerful base capabilities for coding tasks."
SuperCoder is a coding agent that runs in your terminal, offering features like code search, project structure exploration, code editing, bug fixing, and integration with OpenAI or local models.
Simon Willison discusses his experience using Large Language Models (LLMs) for coding, providing detailed advice on how to effectively use LLMs to augment coding abilities, set reasonable expectations, manage context, and more.
An experiment in agentic AI development, where AI tools were tasked with building and maintaining a full-service product, ObjectiveScope, without direct human code modifications. The process highlighted the challenges and constraints of AI-driven development, such as deteriorating context management, technical limitations, and the need for precise prompt engineering.
First / Previous / Next / Last
/ Page 1 of 0