This article provides a verified list of AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Gemini, etc.) with user-agent strings, crawl rates, and IP verification information to help manage access and maintain inclusion in AI discovery.
Fine-tune DeepSeek models using your own markdown files as training data. Converts your notes/docs into high-quality Q&A pairs using Gemini, then trains a personalized LLM via Tinker cloud GPUs.
A $50 Raspberry Pi and Whisplay HAT combination offers a customizable, open-source AI chat device that can utilize Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT, providing an alternative to closed-ecosystem AI gadgets.
This guide covers how you can leverage AI tools to build AI-powered features for your Flutter apps and streamline your Flutter and Dart development.
The author discusses how integrating Google Keep with Gemini has revitalized their use of the note-taking app, allowing for more powerful organization and information retrieval.
This article details a method for finding books on your shelves using Gemini's text recognition capabilities. The author describes how taking pictures of bookshelves and using AI to scan them can help locate lost books and even provide insights into reading habits.
Code Wiki is a platform that maintains a continuously updated, structured wiki for code repositories, aiming to improve developer productivity by unlocking knowledge buried in source code. It features automated documentation, intelligent context-aware chat, and integrated actionable links.
Jules Tools has quietly joined Gemini CLI and GitHub Actions in Google's lineup. This article details how these command-line agents differ and provides examples of their use.
This tutorial explores implementing the LLM Arena-as-a-Judge approach to evaluate large language model outputs using head-to-head comparisons. It demonstrates using OpenAI’s GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, judged by GPT-5, in a customer support scenario.
**Experiment Goal:** Determine if LLMs can autonomously perform root cause analysis (RCA) on live application
Five LLMs were given access to OpenTelemetry data from a demo application,:
* They were prompted with a naive instruction: "Identify the issue, root cause, and suggest solutions."
* Four distinct anomalies were used, each with a known root cause established through manual investigation.
* Performance was measured by: accuracy, guidance required, token usage, and investigation time.
* Models: Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI GPT-o3, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro
* **Autonomous RCA is not yet reliable.** The LLMs generally fell short of replacing SREs. Even GPT-5 (not explicitly tested, but implied as a benchmark) wouldn't outperform the others.
* **LLMs are useful as assistants.** They can help summarize findings, draft updates, and suggest next steps.
* **A fast, searchable observability stack (like ClickStack) is crucial.** LLMs need access to good data to be effective.
* **Models varied in performance:**
* Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 were the most successful, often identifying the root cause with minimal guidance.
* GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro required more prompting and struggled to query data independently.
* **Models can get stuck in reasoning loops.** They may focus on one aspect of the problem and miss other important clues.
* **Token usage and cost varied significantly.**
**Specific Anomaly Results (briefly):**
* **Anomaly 1 (Payment Failure):** Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 solved it on the first prompt. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro needed guidance.
* **Anomaly 2 (Recommendation Cache Leak):** Claude Sonnet 4 identified the service restart issue but missed the cache problem initially. OpenAI o3 identified the memory leak. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro struggled.
Five LLMs were given access to OpenTelemetry data from a demo application,:
* They were prompted with a naive instruction: "Identify the issue, root cause, and suggest solutions."
* Four distinct anomalies were used, each with a known root cause established through manual investigation.
* Performance was measured by: accuracy, guidance required, token usage, and investigation time.
* Models: Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI GPT-o3, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro
* **Autonomous RCA is not yet reliable.** The LLMs generally fell short of replacing SREs. Even GPT-5 (not explicitly tested, but implied as a benchmark) wouldn't outperform the others.
* **LLMs are useful as assistants.** They can help summarize findings, draft updates, and suggest next steps.
* **A fast, searchable observability stack (like ClickStack) is crucial.** LLMs need access to good data to be effective.
* **Models varied in performance:**
* Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 were the most successful, often identifying the root cause with minimal guidance.
* GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro required more prompting and struggled to query data independently.
* **Models can get stuck in reasoning loops.** They may focus on one aspect of the problem and miss other important clues.
* **Token usage and cost varied significantly.**
**Specific Anomaly Results (briefly):**
* **Anomaly 1 (Payment Failure):** Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 solved it on the first prompt. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro needed guidance.
* **Anomaly 2 (Recommendation Cache Leak):** Claude Sonnet 4 identified the service restart issue but missed the cache problem initially. OpenAI o3 identified the memory leak. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro struggled.
