Models referred to as "GPT 3.5"
GPT-3.5 series is a series of models that was trained on a blend of text and code from before Q4 2021. The following models are in the GPT-3.5 series:
code-davinci-002 is a base model, so good for pure code-completion tasks
text-davinci-002 is an InstructGPT model based on code-davinci-002
text-davinci-003 is an improvement on text-davinci-002
gpt-3.5-turbo-0301 is an improvement on text-davinci-003, optimized for chat
GPT-3.5 series is a series of models that was trained on a blend of text and code from before Q4 2021. The following models are in the GPT-3.5 series:
code-davinci-002 is a base model, so good for pure code-completion tasks
text-davinci-002 is an InstructGPT model based on code-davinci-002
text-davinci-003 is an improvement on text-davinci-002
gpt-3.5-turbo-0301 is an improvement on text-davinci-003, optimized for chat
Cool question - and yes, you're right that you can use the summary command to inspect feature_importances for some of the models (e.g. RandomForestClassifier). Other models may not support the same type of summary however.
You should also check out the FieldSelector algorithm which is really useful for this problem. Under the hood, it uses ANOVA & F-Tests to estimate the linear dependency between variables. Although its univariate (not capturing any interactions between variables), it still can provide a good baseline from choosing a handful of features from hundreds.
You should also check out the FieldSelector algorithm which is really useful for this problem. Under the hood, it uses ANOVA & F-Tests to estimate the linear dependency between variables. Although its univariate (not capturing any interactions between variables), it still can provide a good baseline from choosing a handful of features from hundreds.
"This is one of the best 13B models I've tested. (for programming, math, logic, etc) speechless-llama2-hermes-orca-platypus-wizardlm-13b"
