Interact with opencode server over HTTP. The `opencode serve` command runs a headless HTTP server that exposes an OpenAPI endpoint that an opencode client can use.
This article details how to set up an email triage system using Home Assistant and a local Large Language Model (LLM) to summarize and categorize incoming emails, reducing inbox clutter and improving email management. It covers the setup of a REST command to interface with Ollama, the automation process, and the benefits of using a local LLM for privacy.
We test out the latest product from Augment Code, a terminal app called Auggie CLI. How does it compare to other AI command-line interfaces?
- Workspace Indexing: Auggie automatically indexes the project directory, which is beneficial for context but raises security considerations (addressed via .augmentignore files).
Interactive vs. Non-Interactive Mode: The author tests both modes, highlighting the benefits of a one-shot, non-interactive command for quick tasks.
- Code Modification: A key test involves using Auggie to add Bootstrap classes to a Rails view file. Auggie successfully analyzed the existing code, generated a correct diff, and applied the changes.
- Workspace Indexing: Auggie automatically indexes the project directory, which is beneficial for context but raises security considerations (addressed via .augmentignore files).
Interactive vs. Non-Interactive Mode: The author tests both modes, highlighting the benefits of a one-shot, non-interactive command for quick tasks.
- Code Modification: A key test involves using Auggie to add Bootstrap classes to a Rails view file. Auggie successfully analyzed the existing code, generated a correct diff, and applied the changes.
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides tools for interacting with JMAP (JSON Meta Application Protocol) email servers. Built with Deno and using the jmap-jam client library.
**Experiment Goal:** Determine if LLMs can autonomously perform root cause analysis (RCA) on live application
Five LLMs were given access to OpenTelemetry data from a demo application,:
* They were prompted with a naive instruction: "Identify the issue, root cause, and suggest solutions."
* Four distinct anomalies were used, each with a known root cause established through manual investigation.
* Performance was measured by: accuracy, guidance required, token usage, and investigation time.
* Models: Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI GPT-o3, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro
* **Autonomous RCA is not yet reliable.** The LLMs generally fell short of replacing SREs. Even GPT-5 (not explicitly tested, but implied as a benchmark) wouldn't outperform the others.
* **LLMs are useful as assistants.** They can help summarize findings, draft updates, and suggest next steps.
* **A fast, searchable observability stack (like ClickStack) is crucial.** LLMs need access to good data to be effective.
* **Models varied in performance:**
* Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 were the most successful, often identifying the root cause with minimal guidance.
* GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro required more prompting and struggled to query data independently.
* **Models can get stuck in reasoning loops.** They may focus on one aspect of the problem and miss other important clues.
* **Token usage and cost varied significantly.**
**Specific Anomaly Results (briefly):**
* **Anomaly 1 (Payment Failure):** Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 solved it on the first prompt. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro needed guidance.
* **Anomaly 2 (Recommendation Cache Leak):** Claude Sonnet 4 identified the service restart issue but missed the cache problem initially. OpenAI o3 identified the memory leak. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro struggled.
Five LLMs were given access to OpenTelemetry data from a demo application,:
* They were prompted with a naive instruction: "Identify the issue, root cause, and suggest solutions."
* Four distinct anomalies were used, each with a known root cause established through manual investigation.
* Performance was measured by: accuracy, guidance required, token usage, and investigation time.
* Models: Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI GPT-o3, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro
* **Autonomous RCA is not yet reliable.** The LLMs generally fell short of replacing SREs. Even GPT-5 (not explicitly tested, but implied as a benchmark) wouldn't outperform the others.
* **LLMs are useful as assistants.** They can help summarize findings, draft updates, and suggest next steps.
* **A fast, searchable observability stack (like ClickStack) is crucial.** LLMs need access to good data to be effective.
* **Models varied in performance:**
* Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 were the most successful, often identifying the root cause with minimal guidance.
* GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro required more prompting and struggled to query data independently.
* **Models can get stuck in reasoning loops.** They may focus on one aspect of the problem and miss other important clues.
* **Token usage and cost varied significantly.**
**Specific Anomaly Results (briefly):**
* **Anomaly 1 (Payment Failure):** Claude Sonnet 4 and OpenAI o3 solved it on the first prompt. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro needed guidance.
* **Anomaly 2 (Recommendation Cache Leak):** Claude Sonnet 4 identified the service restart issue but missed the cache problem initially. OpenAI o3 identified the memory leak. GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro struggled.
Perplexity defends its AI assistants against Cloudflare’s claims, arguing that they are not web crawlers but user-triggered agents.
This blog post details a personal code review tool built around `llm` and `git diff`. It describes installation, how it works, how the author uses it, and its advantages over GitHub's Copilot review tool.
The glamourous AI coding agent for your favourite terminal
The article discusses using AI for code review, emphasizing that it should be used as a tool to flag potential issues for human review, similar to how a spell checker works. It highlights a tool created by Bill Mill to aid in this process, which uses a command-line interface to connect to LLMs. The author stresses the importance of discernment when accepting AI suggestions and provides the system prompt used in the tool.
Augment Code joins the CLI coding agent race, positioning itself as and alternative to Claude Code with a focus on automation.
