A comprehensive overview of the current state of Multi-Concept Prompting (MCP), including advancements, challenges, and future directions.
LLM Council works together to answer your hardest questions. A local web app that uses OpenRouter to send queries to multiple LLMs, have them review/rank each other's work, and finally a Chairman LLM produces the final response.
This article details how the author successfully ran OpenAI's Codex CLI against a gpt-oss:120b model hosted on an NVIDIA DGX Spark, accessed through a Tailscale network. It covers the setup of Tailscale, Ollama configuration, and the process of running the Codex CLI with the remote model, including building a Space Invaders game.
Researchers at MIT’s CSAIL are charting a more "modular" path ahead for software development, breaking systems into "concepts" and "synchronizations" to make code clearer, safer, and easier for LLMs to generate.
MIT researchers are proposing a new software development approach centered around "concepts" and "synchronizations" to address issues of complexity, safety, and LLM compatibility in modern software.
Concepts are self-contained units of functionality (like "sharing" or "liking") with their own state and actions, whereas synchronizations are explicit rules defining how these concepts interact, expressed in a simple, LLM-friendly language.
The benefits include ncreased modularity, transparency, easier understanding for both humans and AI, improved safety, and potential for automated software development. Real-world application: has been demonstrated by successfully restructuring features (liking, commenting, sharing) to be more modular and legible.
Future includes concept catalogs, a shift in software architecture, and improved collaboration through shared, well-tested concepts.
MIT researchers are proposing a new software development approach centered around "concepts" and "synchronizations" to address issues of complexity, safety, and LLM compatibility in modern software.
Concepts are self-contained units of functionality (like "sharing" or "liking") with their own state and actions, whereas synchronizations are explicit rules defining how these concepts interact, expressed in a simple, LLM-friendly language.
The benefits include ncreased modularity, transparency, easier understanding for both humans and AI, improved safety, and potential for automated software development. Real-world application: has been demonstrated by successfully restructuring features (liking, commenting, sharing) to be more modular and legible.
Future includes concept catalogs, a shift in software architecture, and improved collaboration through shared, well-tested concepts.
This GitHub repository directory contains resources for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs), including a Jupyter Notebook demonstrating how to use LLM Arena as a judge and a Python script for the same purpose. It also includes a README file with instructions on how to view the notebook if it doesn't render correctly on GitHub.
An Apple study shows that large language models (LLMs) can improve performance by using a checklist-based reinforcement learning scheme, similar to a simple productivity trick of checking one's work.
Nvidia’s NeMo Retriever models and RAG pipeline make quick work of ingesting PDFs and generating reports based on them. Chalk one up for the plan-reflect-refine architecture.
This repository contains the source code for the summarize-and-chat project. This project provides a unified document summarization and chat framework with LLMs, aiming to address the challenges of building a scalable solution for document summarization while facilitating natural language interactions through chat interfaces.
A new study by MIT CSAIL researchers maps the challenges of AI in software development, identifying bottlenecks and highlighting research directions to move the field forward, aiming to allow humans to focus on high-level design while automating routine tasks.
A blog post comparing when to use regular Google search versus LLMs for research, outlining the strengths and weaknesses of each. It details scenarios where search engines excel (facts, current events, specific sources) and where LLMs shine (analysis, synthesis, creative thinking). It also lists tasks LLMs struggle with, such as complex reasoning, real-time information, and fact verification.
