klotz: evaluation*

0 bookmark(s) - Sort by: Date ↓ / Title / - Bookmarks from other users for this tag

  1. AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in practice. This discrepancy highlights a fundamental limitation of current evaluations: compressing agent behavior into a single success metric obscures critical operational flaws. Notably, it ignores whether agents behave consistently across runs, withstand perturbations, fail predictably, or have bounded error severity.

    Key contributions:

    > 1. A formal taxonomy and metric suite: We translate qualitative safety-critical principles into computable metrics, enabling evaluation of agent reliability independently of task success.
    >2. A comprehensive reliability profile of modern agents: A detailed mapping of where state-of-the-art agentic models succeed and fail, isolating consistency and predictability as the dimensions requiring immediate research focus.
    2026-02-28 Tags: , , , by klotz
  2. This article details the steps to move a Large Language Model (LLM) from a prototype to a production-ready system, covering aspects like observability, evaluation, cost management, and scalability.
  3. LLM EvalKit is a streamlined framework that helps developers design, test, and refine prompt‑engineering pipelines for Large Language Models (LLMs). It encompasses prompt management, dataset handling, evaluation, and automated optimization, all wrapped in a Streamlit web UI.

    Key capabilities:

    | Stage | What it does | Typical workflow |
    |-------|-------------|------------------|
    | **Prompt Management** | Create, edit, version, and test prompts (name, text, model, system instructions). | Define a prompt, load/edit existing ones, run quick generation tests, and maintain version history. |
    | **Dataset Creation** | Organize data for evaluation. Loads CSV, JSON, JSONL files into GCS buckets. | Create dataset folders, upload files, preview items. |
    | **Evaluation** | Run model‑based or human‑in‑the‑loop metrics; compare outcomes across prompt versions. | Choose prompt + dataset, generate responses, score with metrics like “question‑answering‑quality”, save baseline results to a leaderboard. |
    | **Optimization** | Leveraging Vertex AI’s prompt‑optimization job to automatically search for better prompts. | Configure job (model, dataset, prompt), launch, and monitor training in Vertex AI console. |
    | **Results & Records** | Visualize optimization outcomes, compare versions, and maintain a record of performance over time. | View leaderboard, select best optimized prompt, paste new instructions, re‑evaluate, and track progress. |

    **Getting Started**

    1. Clone the repo, set up a virtual environment, install dependencies, and run `streamlit run index.py`.
    2. Configure `src/.env` with `BUCKET_NAME` and `PROJECT_ID`.
    3. Use the UI to create/edit prompts, datasets, and launch evaluations/optimizations as described in the tutorial steps.

    **Token Use‑Case**

    - **Prompt**: “Problem: {{query}}nImage: {{image}} @@@image/jpegnAnswer: {{target}}”
    - **Example input JSON**: query, choices, image URL, target answer.
    - **Model**: `gemini-2.0-flash-001`.

    **License** – Apache 2.0.
  4. This tutorial explores implementing the LLM Arena-as-a-Judge approach to evaluate large language model outputs using head-to-head comparisons. It demonstrates using OpenAI’s GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, judged by GPT-5, in a customer support scenario.
  5. frozen-in-time version of our Paper Finder agent for reproducing evaluation results. This repo contains the code for the standalone Paper Finder agent. PaperFinder is our paper-seeking agent, which is intended to assist in locating sets of papers according to content-based and metadata criteria.
  6. This GitHub repository directory contains resources for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs), including a Jupyter Notebook demonstrating how to use LLM Arena as a judge and a Python script for the same purpose. It also includes a README file with instructions on how to view the notebook if it doesn't render correctly on GitHub.
  7. MCP-Universe is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers across 6 core domains and 231 tasks. It highlights the challenges of long-context reasoning, unfamiliar tool spaces, and cross-domain variations in LLM performance.
  8. An introduction to Scheme programming language basics including its characteristics, primitive data types, list operations, expression evaluation, variables, function definition, equality predicates, and control structures.
  9. Arize Phoenix is an open-source observability library for AI experimentation, evaluation, and troubleshooting, built by Arize AI.
  10. This article discusses methods to measure and improve the accuracy of Large Language Model (LLM) applications, focusing on building an SQL Agent where precision is crucial. It covers setting up the environment, creating a prototype, evaluating accuracy, and using techniques like self-reflection and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance performance.
    2024-12-20 Tags: , , , , , by klotz

Top of the page

First / Previous / Next / Last / Page 1 of 0 SemanticScuttle - klotz.me: Tags: evaluation

About - Propulsed by SemanticScuttle